Yankees Championship! Poor argument for salary caps.

Baseball 15 Nov 2009

yankess celebrate

Congratulations to the New York Yankees for winning their 27th World Series Championship in the franchise’s storied 107 year history! Of course, with a payroll of over $208 million (over $50M more than the next highest team salary in MLB) they should have won…right?

Probably more than any of their 26 other championships, this Yankees’ victory has been like a burning match thrown into the “Salary Cap” powder keg, igniting an explosive outcry from fans who feel the balance of power and opportunity for all teams in MLB to compete has been destroyed. More than ever, fans of teams like the Pirates, Royals, Marlins and Padres yearn for a system like those that exist in the NFL and NBA where team payrolls are artificially capped to force equality in resources, and theoretically competitive balance amongst all the teams.

Unfortunately, for these self proclaimed underprivileged and forsaken fans of the baseball world, the truth of the matter is that there is no concrete evidence that salary caps significantly increase the chances for all teams to win championships. Looking at the other major professional sports leagues that have incorporated salary caps, purportedly to improve the league’s competitive balance, there appears to be only one true function that the salary caps in place have served – to provide controllable and predictable costs for team owners. Let’s take a look at some of the evidence that debunks the competitive balance myth.

Let me preface the assertions that follow by saying that I do believe teams with significantly more financial resources should have a better chance of success on the field if their management can effectively identify, develop, and direct talent. However, if it was true that the Yankees “bought” themselves a championship this season, and that money is the deciding factor in bringing pride and top bragging rights to your city and fans, then why haven’t the highest spending teams won it all every year? Why is this the first time in 9 years that the Bronx Bombers have gone the distance, despite boasting the highest payroll each of the past 9 seasons?

For that matter how come the Yankees haven’t taken home the trophy even half of the time? Heck, how come in just just looking over the past 22 years, most of the time the highest paying teams have not even made it to the World series, let alone win it? Since 1988 the teams with the highest team payroll have made it to the World Series 7 times, and won it only 5 times – that’s a less than 25% chance of winning it all while spending it all over the past 22 seasons. The fact is, 8 different organizations have won the World Series over the past 9 seasons, and there have been 19 different organizations win it all over the past 27 years. By comparison the NFL, supposedly more competitively balanced by their salary cap structure, had only 6 different winners during the past 9 seasons, and 14 over the past 27.

As for the reportedly more balanced NBA (which was heralded as the example of healthy competitive balance created through their salary cap system by baseball ownership representatives during the labor negotiations in 1994), they’ve had only 5 different teams win it all over the past 9 seasons, and only 8 different cities have celebrated in the streets since instituting their equalizing salary cap in 1984! Hmmmm…do you think the Detroit Lions or L.A. Clipper fans are feeling the parity right now in their salary capped leagues? Does the fact that last year 6 NBA teams lost over 70% of their games, or that Vegas odds makers only give 5 teams in their entire league a better than 10% chance of winning the title scream out competitive balance, parity, and more enjoyment for their fans?

Looking at it from a slightly different angle, there was a report done in 2002 calculating the disparity in salaries between MLB teams, and the corresponding disparity in wins between the teams using data spanning from 1929 – 2002. Probably to no one’s surprise the disparity in payroll between teams almost doubled during that 74 year span. However, what may be eye opening is the fact that during that period while payroll disparities were increasing, the disparity of victories between teams throughout MLB had stayed the same in the A.L. and actually decreased by 20% in the N.L.! In other words, despite the difference in salaries between the “Haves” and “Have Nots” almost doubling since 1929, the competitve balance remained the same in the A.L. and it actually improved in the N.L. Part of this phenomenon may be explained by the addition of more talent to the overall pool of players with the addition of African-American athletes in 1945, and later with the influx of foreign players from South America, Asia, Australia, Canada, etc. over the past 30 years. The point is, more than ever it is getting harder to significantly improve your chances of winning a championship simply by spending more money.

There are countless other examples, statistics, and breakdowns of how MLB has had a greater diversity of winners and losers at every end of the financial spectrum than either of the other two major sports leagues which do have salary caps in place. But the bottom line is this – it’s not how much you spend, it’s how you spend it. It’s not the players fault if certain MLB owners have been unable to produce competitive teams or reportedly make a profit during the industry’s “Golden Age”. An industry that is the only legal monopoly in the United States, which reportedly generated over $6.6 Billion in revenue just last year, and gives tens of millions of dollars through revenue sharing to it’s supposedly financially neediest clubs. Fans have a right to be mad if their team is a perennial loser because in most cases, and now more than ever, it has less to do with payroll, and a lot more to do with inept front office management, or a continued commitment to mediocrity by their team’s ownership.

Go ahead, Pirate fans, and get mad that the Yankees won, but try not to automatically take the easy route and blame it all on the Players Union for refusing to accept a hard salary cap. Poor management, misguided player evaluation, player underperformance, irresponsible use of funds, and ownership apathy are prevalent in every sports league, salary cap or not.

A tip of the cap to the Yankees players, coaches, management, and ownership who earned a championship this season, in what many still consider to be the most competitive league in all of sports.


← Adrian..should he stay, or should he go now?


  1. Vanessa
    January 15, 2015 at 9:28 pm

    Hi admin do you need unlimited articles for your page ?
    What if you could copy article from other sources, make it
    pass copyscape test and publish on your page – i know the right tool
    for you, just search in google:
    Ziakdra’s article tool

  2. pea coat men
    November 30, 2013 at 12:00 pm

    College thinks nice post here. You must check out the wear and coats styles!

  3. portefeuille homme longchamp pas cher
    October 17, 2013 at 12:45 am

    Headline pouvez-Vous choisir us seul parmi l’effect des nombreux qui sont disponib? Quels sont ceux qui vont corp?Ter moins cher? Crush’effect des sont celfeel qui sont p mieux adaptés à votre peau et votre draw the sword? Are likely to be plupart signifiants gens trouvent qu’il s’av’e rrtre difficile prendre une décision à propos Sac Longchamps Pas Cher s. Dans cet fabric, Il sera proposer quelques pistes pots. Faire l’ordre dom ce processus plus décision beaucoup easy.

  4. herve leger size 14
    August 20, 2013 at 12:52 am

    Buying one of these dresses, via an online retailer is a good exemplar in many cases. I believe. Most of online retailers present better deals than many according to rule supplies; they have a lower price than a orally transmitted fund. May be many family will have such torment: cheap price proceeds, is very well. But the peculiarity, the service, can they have security|warrant|assurance|guarantee}? I haven’t belief. What’s more, shopping online? Is it really unhurt? I have no actual observation of shopping online, I am fear|timid|distrustful|anxious|alarmed|afraid} I run into the rogue.

  5. herve leger wrap dress
    August 20, 2013 at 12:48 am

    However, how to meet with such area, how to buy those cheap Herve Leger garments? Sometimes, it seems very firm. There are so many shops where exchange those clothes in the society, which one has cheap garments in elevated quality?

  6. herve leger size 4
    August 20, 2013 at 12:48 am

    Now, there are few tips for your deliberation. I confidence those tips can help you discover the low-priced duplicate Herve Leger garments.

  7. herve leger signature bandage dress
    August 20, 2013 at 12:42 am

    I am sure different women have different opinions, just as one thousand clan have one thousand thoughts. May be some women consider Dior is the best clothes in there organ of circulation; May be some women think Parada is the best delight in, or may be having women are faithful fans of D

  8. herve leger 90210
    August 20, 2013 at 12:39 am

    Women have a universal character that is affectionate beauty, have affection for clothes, especially amazing clothes. They have a assurance clan should hang on clothes if she want to be a fine someone. As for me, I firmly believe the clothes Herve Leger can let me become a more fine woman. Do you think so?

  9. dress as chemistry product
    August 20, 2013 at 12:38 am

    I am sure different women have different opinions, just as one thousand people have one thousand thoughts. May be some women consider Dior is the best clothing in there centre of circulation; May be some women think Parada is the best regard with affection, or may be having women are faithful fans of D

  10. herve leger white
    August 20, 2013 at 12:37 am

    In my impression, if you wish to fall upon such hoard|shop}, you will never fall upon. In fact, the clothing in orally transmitted hoard|shop} are all so heaven-kissing-priced|of great value|requiring great outlay|expensive}, the value are about 20,000 dollars, even more heaven-kissing-priced|of great value|requiring great outlay|expensive}. It can be called invented value, we can only have a sigh seeing the dresses.

  11. herve leger vintage couture
    August 20, 2013 at 12:35 am

    In deed, you need not to worry about those things. Shopping online has developed so many years, already become more and more time|complete|perfect|ripe|full-grown|mature}. Now, the safety enigma of shopping online is not the enigma. Of course, we also need very concerned because nobody can have 100% dependence to insure there are no jeopardy when you shopping online. While I want to say you need not filling with terror to shopping online.

  12. herve leger skirt shopstyle
    August 20, 2013 at 12:31 am

    Buying one of these dresses, via an online retailer is a profitable archetype in many cases. I believe. Most of online retailers offer better deals than many formal stores; they have a lower price than a traditional provision. May be many clan will have such badger: low-priced price proceeds, is very well. But the trait, the labor, can they have security|warrant|assurance|guarantee}? I harbor’t confidence. What’s more, shopping online? Is it really unhurt? I have no actual presentation of shopping online, I am affright|timid|distrustful|anxious|alarmed|afraid} I run into the impostor.

  13. herve leger max azria bandage dress
    August 20, 2013 at 12:18 am

    For the online site, they also have credit, they can not only proffer better prices in useful quality, but also render certain collect for use useful service. As a buyer, you can get the useful quality Herve Leger clothes in low-priced value and the useful service at the same time. In etc add, it is also a lot easier to estimate relatively prices online than it is to go to see a tell off of supermarkets and shops for the same final cause. You can alternative the best online site which fill up ample produce in cheapest value. You only need tick you mouse, you can find the fine clothes easily. Certainly, you need only worn out the fewest standard of value. Don’t you think it is a best of both worlds ways?